Gladesville ‘Village’ Development
Report on Architectus briefing Feb 11, 2014
Over a hundred people turned up at the public meeting in the town hall to hear a preliminary response from Architectus, Council’s consultants, to the Gladesville Shopping Village Development Application and Traffic Consultants McLaren Engineering.
Summary – withdraw or redesign
Architectus has recommended that the applicant either
• Withdraw the DA, or
• Make substantial modifications to the DA, which will warrant re-exhibition of the proposal.
Submissions received
The consultants made an overview of the 277 submissions received, of which 271 objected to the proposal.
The major issues raised were:
• Traffic and Transport – 32%
• Height bulk and scale – 13%
• Design and aesthetics – 10%
• Heritage – 8%
• Lack of infrastructure – 6%
• Density – 3%
• Community engagement – 2%
Architectus response to submissions
The website shows the full list as well as the consultant’s response to the key issues raised, which included the following:
- Should amended plans be submitted, which address the concerns raised, then Community consultation should be an integral part of the design process.
- Architectus has sought clarification from the applicant regarding height and floor space calculations.
- Architectus has recommended a reconsideration of the design in relation to materials and finishes, expression of entry points and podium design.
- The Flagstaff St wall should be only 2-3 storeys in height
- There should be a retail analysis provided to identify demand for retail and commercial floor space in the vicinity.
- Noise impacts should be a condition of any approval and approprate mitigation measures taken
- Privacy to the town houses in Massey St to be improved
- Pedestrian accessibility and permeability through the site to be maximised
- Lack of infrastructure to be addressed through a monetary contribution (Section 94A) to Council
- Public open space and landscaping to be redesigned to serve as a community focus
- Safety and security to be upgraded
- Traffic – there are major deficiencies in traffic and parking
Heritage impact – No 10 Cowell St and surrounding heritage items
- The LEP and DCP assume comprehensive development of the site.
- Relocation of the timber cottage should be considered.
- Architectus has commissioned an independent heritage assessment of the proposal