New – The Green Book website
Recent comments
- Donald Holdsworth on DRAFT COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN
- Christine Hanrahan on Loss of Heritage Sandstone kerbs
- Juanita Mosterd on 2 Vernon Street saved from demolition
- Glenys Brown on Hunters Hill gardens open for inspection
Links
- Australian Conservation Foundation
- Australian Heritage Photographic Database
- Bushland and biodiversity
- Discover Hunters Hill
- Environment Defenders Office (NSW)
- Gladesville Community
- Glebe Society
- Green Book
- Habitat Network
- Historical photographic collection Ryde Library
- Hunters Hill Bushcare Volunteers
- Hunters Hill Council
- Hunters Hill Historical Society
- Lane Cove Bushland and Conservation Society
- National Trust of Australia
- Nature Conservation Council NSW
- Ryde Hunters Hill Flora & Fauna Preservation Society
- Sydney Living Museums
WW1 returned service cottage threatened with demolition
18 Richmond Crescent
The proposed demolition of number 18 Richmond Crescent would destroy the last remaining WW1 returned soldier settlement cottage in original condition in our area. This would erode the overall value of the conservation precinct.
Hunter’s Hill Council initially refused the DA to demolish the cottage, undertake a major excavation and construct a very large 3 storey building that is completely out of character in this Conversation Area and does not comply with the LEP.
The amended plans that are now being considered do not appear to adequately address the issues raised by concerned neighbours or the Council:
Condition 2: The Proposal does not comply with the landscaped area provisions of clause 6.9 of LEP 2012.
Condition 3, 12 and 13: No proper case has been made for the demolition of the existing dwelling on the site which is in a Conservation Area under LEP 2012; the proposal would create an undesirable precedent for Council and would not be in the public interest
Condition 4 and 5:
The proposed replacement house is not appropriate to the character of the conservation area and does not satisfy the heritage and streetscape requirements of Council’s Conservation Advisory Panel or Council’s Heritage Adviser.
Conditions 6, 7, 8 & 9:
The proposed replacement house is three storeys in height by definition and contrary to the objectives as set out under clause 4.3 of LEP 2012; it conflicts with clause 3.3.4(f)(iii) of DCP 2013 through major excavation of the site in excess of 1 metre below natural ground level; the front steps and landing breach the local building line and approval would create an undesirable precedent for Council
Condition 10:Inadequate details have been provided for the construction of the new front fence.