Author Archives: Tony

Altering heritage items: ‘taking it like a man’

from Tony Coote, HHT’s representative on Hunters Hill Council’s Conservation Advisory Panel (CAP) One thing I’ve noticed over the years in relation to alterations and additions to heritage items and proposed works in conservation areas is that the proponents of such works (architects, usually) use the Burra Charter Article 22 New work (22.2) “New work should be […]
Tagged | Leave a comment

Boarding house proposed for narrow site

Hunters Hill Council is currently reviewing a Development Application for the construction of a boarding house that would provide accommodation for 12 people and a manager on a narrow 450 square meter site at 2 Flagstaff Street, Gladesville. Each person will have accommodation ranging from 15-25 square meters in size.  There will be parking for […]
Tagged , | Leave a comment

Sir John Sulman’s vision of a ‘garden city’

This house at 18 Richmond Crescent Gladesville was featured in the November 2016 Trust Journal under the heading ‘Heritage under Threat‘. Council had received a development application to demolish the house and construct a new, much larger, house in its place.  Trust committee member, Caroline Mackaness, wrote a submission to Council about it, much of […]
Tagged , | Leave a comment

Project home-land for NSW

NSW Department of Planning is asking us all to comment on NSW’s new Housing Code.  It’s informative that they should choose such a dreadful house and garden to illustrate their invitation. This particular example of the genus Project Home fails on every count to add anything positive to any neighbourhood and its choice says much about the […]
Tagged | Leave a comment

Planning disaster unfolding

In a letter to the Sydney Morning Herald on December 2, Jennifer Crone of Bondi described the nightmare of six days a week building happening opposite her apartment.  She is faced with the prospect of 60 trucks a day emitting diesel exhaust fumes and intense noise into her apartment from breakfast to dusk for the […]
Tagged | Leave a comment

Demolishing the demolishers

the Sydney Morning Herald published HHT President Tony Coote’s letter responding to Michael Pascoe’s article Heritage laws should be demolished. ‘Self appointed heritage expert, Michael Pascoe, is clearly an avatar of that old-time religion of the 1950s – Progress. Progress is the religion of property developers, miners, laissez-faire capitalists, billionaires and, until recently, our government, under Tony Abbott and his Team […]
Tagged | Leave a comment

Huge fine for demolition of heritage listed house

The Block winners face a massive fine and will have to ‘rebuild’ (?) the heritage-listed Melbourne home they demolished without a permit.  They also cut down all the trees  See details in SMH. Some of us hate ‘The Block’. It completely commodifies places where people live.   The winner is the one who makes the most […]
Tagged | Leave a comment

What we need from a revised plan at Gladesville shops

Restore the 5 meter wide setback from Cowell Street to ensure deep soil planting and a green wall along this boundary Pedestrian footpath along the western side of Flagstaff Street Heritage-listed cottage at 10 Cowell Street incorporated, not demolished Design with high architectural values Start by building a new underground car park so all the access issues are addressed and […]
Tagged | Leave a comment

Gladesville ‘Village’ Development

Report on Architectus briefing Feb 11, 2014 Over a hundred people turned up at the public meeting in the town hall to hear a preliminary response from Architectus, Council’s consultants, to the Gladesville Shopping Village Development Application and Traffic Consultants McLaren Engineering. Summary – withdraw or redesign Architectus has recommended that the applicant either • Withdraw the […]
Tagged | Leave a comment

Hunters Hill Trust opposes current plans for Gladesville shopping village

The major problems with what is proposed: G R O S S  over-development of the site Does not comply with minimum setbacks in SEPP 65 The DCP which sets the planning controls, is flawed and misleading Adverse impact on the character and amenity of the surrounding residential and commercial areas Exacerbates existing parking and traffic problems […]
Tagged | Leave a comment